Marcus Clarke v. Brian Birkholz

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20252:24-cv-05636California628 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:24-cv-05636-MWC-SSC Date: February 14, 2025 Title Marcus Clarke v. Warden Brian Birkholz

Present: The Honorable Stephanie S. Christensen, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Teagan Snyder n/a Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Why Complaint Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute and/or Comply with Court Order

On July 1, 2024, pro se Plaintiff Marcus Clarke filed a complaint against the Warden of the Federal Correctional Institution Lompoc II. (ECF 1.) The Court screened the complaint as required by statute and, on September 3, 2024, issued an order advising Plaintiff that he had failed to state a civil rights claim under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). (ECF 5.) The Court allowed Plaintiff until October 3, 2024, to notify the Court of his intention to proceed on the complaint based on non-Bivens claims only, or to file a first amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.