In Re Meta Pixel Healthcare Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20253:22-cv-03580California830 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE META PIXEL HEALTHCARE Case No. 22-cv-03580-WHO (VKD)

LITIGATION

8 This Document Relates To: ORDER RE FACT DEPOSITIONS 9 All Actions. 10

12 The Court has reviewed the parties’ February 14, 2025 status report regarding their efforts to agree on the number, duration, scope, and scheduling of fact witness depositions. The results of those efforts are not impressive. Accordingly, the Court provides the following direction, with which the parties must comply unless they agree otherwise: 1. Individual depositions. Plaintiffs may take no more than 12 depositions of individual fact witnesses. They have already taken two individual fact witness depositions, so they have 10 remaining. Plaintiffs shall choose their remaining deponents wisely, as they will not be permitted to take more than 12 individual fact witness depositions absent a stipulation or leave of the court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(a)(2). In discussing any depositions beyond the 12-deposition limit, the parties…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.