GS Holistic, LLC v. Yosif Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20253:22-cv-07633California476 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GS HOLISTIC, LLC, Case No. 22-cv-07633-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE DEFAULT JUDGMENT

v.

YOSIF INC, et al., Defendants.

12 In this trademark dispute, plaintiff GS Holistic, LLC renews its request for a default judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b). Dkt. No. 30. The parties’ familiarity with the record is assumed, and the motion is denied.1 In the prior order denying entry of default judgment, the Court was skeptical of GS Holistic’s “copy-and-paste approach to pleadings” and so incorporated the reasoning of orders from other judges in this District denying entry of a default judgment based on similar pleadings and filings. Dkt. No. 25 at 1-2 (citing cases). The Court further observed that, in connection with the single sale of assertedly counterfeit products mentioned in the complaint, GS Holistic “did not allege which ‘Stündenglass Mark’ was infringed . . . or otherwise provide facts that might make a trademark claim plausible,” let alone…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.