Glaze

Glaze v. Warden, California Rehabilitation Center

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20253:23-cv-02327California3,277 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ISAIAH T. GLAZE, Case No. 23-cv-02327-JSC

Petitioner,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

WARDEN, CALIFORNIA Re: Dkt. No.

REHABILITATION CENTER,

11 Respondent.

12 INTRODUCTION Petitioner, a prisoner of the State of California proceeding without the assistance of an attorney, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his conviction and sentence. (ECF No. 1.) After screening the petition, the Court found, when liberally construed, it stated a claim capable of judicial determination that his trial attorney’s advice to plead guilty violated his Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel. (ECF No. 13.) Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss the petition as untimely. (ECF No. 20.) Petitioner filed an opposition, and Respondent filed a reply. (ECF Nos. 25, 26.) For the reasons discussed below, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.