Clements
Clements v. Ivory
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GEORGE BERNARD CLEMENTS, JR. Case No. 24-cv-04601-AMO Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES MILOUS JAMES IVORY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 29 Defendants. 11 12 Before the Court is Plaintiff George Bernard Clements, Jr.’s motion for $20,650.33 in attorney’s fees which Plaintiff seeks to recover as a result of Defendant Milous James Ivory’s three failed removal attempts. ECF 29. On January 23, 2025, Ivory filed an opposition to the instant motion (ECF 30),1 and on January 27, 2025, Clements filed a reply (ECF 31). The motion is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7-6. This Order assumes familiarity with the facts and history of this case. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered the arguments therein and the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS IN PART Clements’s motion for the following reasons. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), an order remanding a case “may require…