Tanner

Tanner v. Plavan Commercial Fueling, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20253:24-cv-01341California3,362 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 Case No. 3:24-cv-1341-BTM-JLB 10 TRACY TANNER, on behalf of himself and

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

all others similarly situated,

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF Plaintiff,

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND

TO DIRECT NOTICE OF PROPOSED

v. SETTLEMENT TO THE CLASS

PLAVAN COMMERCIAL FUELING, INC., 16 [ECF No. 20] Defendant.

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval and to Direct Notice of Proposed Settlement to the Settlement Class (ECF No. 20). The terms of the proposed settlement (the “Proposed Settlement”) are set forth in a Settlement Agreement with accompanying exhibits attached as Exhibit A to Plaintiffs’ motion (the “Settlement Agreement”).1 Having fully considered the issue, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion and orders as follows: 1. Class Certification for Settlement Purposes Only. The Settlement Agreement provides for: (i) a Settlement Class consisting of individuals to whom…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.