Tortorice

(PC) Dorton v. Tortorice

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20251:23-cv-01784California792 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRED DORTON, No. 1:23-cv-01784 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

v. PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED

COMPLAINT, AND GRANTING IN PART

STEVE TORTORICE, et al., PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO EXCEED THE

CURRENT 25 PAGE LIMIT

Defendants. (ECF No. 31)

PLAINTIFF’S THIRD AMENDED

COMPLAINT DUE FEBRUARY 27, 2025 18 19 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff has filed a motion for an extension of time to file his third amended complaint (“TAC”). ECF No. 31. This is his second request to do so. See ECF No. 26 (motion for ninety- day extension of time). The motion also requests that he be permitted to file a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.