Johnny Shaw v. Chance Andes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHNNY SHAW, Case No. 5:22-cv-00669-FLA (SK)

Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION TO DENY

HABEAS PETITION

CHANCE ANDES, Acting Warden, Respondent. 16 17 In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has reviewed the filed Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) to Deny Habeas Petition, any pertinent records as needed, and Petitioner’s objections (ECF 28, 30). The court has reviewed de novo those identifiable portions of the R&R to which Petitioner has timely and properly objected. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

1 Petitioner initially filed his objections with a Request for Judicial Notice, which the court previously addressed. (ECF 28–29). Petitioner has since clarified that he intended the arguments presented in his request for judicial notice as objections to the R&R (and at the same time…