B.M.

B.M. v. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20255:20-cv-00656California4,436 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 J.M. as Personal Representative of the Case No. 20-cv-00656-BLF

ESTATE OF B.M.,

ORDER GRANTING FRANCHISOR Plaintiff, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISSS THE SECOND AMENDED v. COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.,

et al., [Re: ECF 185]

Defendants.

13 B.M. (now deceased) brought this action against several hotel chains under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (“TVPRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 1589 et seq., alleging that she was sex trafficked in rooms rented under their brands. See Compl., ECF 1. Upon B.M.’s death, her mother J.M. substituted in as Plaintiff. See Order, ECF 121. J.M. thereafter filed the operative second amended complaint (“SAC”), adding new defendants and dropping others, and adding new state law claims for negligence and wrongful…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.