Delgado

Delgado v. Target Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20251:24-cv-01396California910 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 VIRDIANA DELGADO, Case No. 1:24-cv-01396-KES-CDB Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO PAY

SANCTIONS OF $100 PER DAY

v. (Doc. 10) TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Virdiana Delgado (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action with the filing of a complaint in Kern County Superior Court, Case No. BCV-103400, on October 9, 2024. (Doc. 1). Defendant Target Corporation (“Defendant”) removed the state action to this Court on November 14, 2024. (Id.). On November 14, 2024, the Court entered the order setting the initial scheduling conference for February 11, 2025, at 9:30 AM. (Doc. 2). In its order, the parties were provided the email address for the undersigned’s courtroom deputy for the parties to request and obtain Zoom teleconference connection details. (Id. at 2). Further, the courtroom deputy forwarded the Zoom connection details via email to counsel for the parties in advance of the scheduling conference. The parties convened via Zoom videoconference for a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.