Uddin

(PC) Davis v. Uddin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20252:22-cv-00864California6,149 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAURICE DARONTE DAVIS, No. 2:22-cv-0864-SCR-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND MESKATH UDDIN, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In the operative complaint, plaintiff alleges an Eighth Amendment physical and sexual assault claim against defendant Dr. Uddin based on a medical examination that occurred on March 9, 2020. Currently pending before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 31. The motion has been fully briefed by the parties. ECF Nos. 36, 43. For the reasons explained below, the undersigned recommends granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. I. Summary Judgment Standards Under Rule 56 Summary judgment is appropriate when it is demonstrated that there “is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.