Hillberg

(PC) Spearman v. Hillberg

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20252:23-cv-00093California839 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REGINALD EDWARD SPEARMAN, No. 2:23-cv-00093-DJC-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER

RONALD W. HILLBERG, et al.,

Defendants.

Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota issued Findings and Recommendations on May 8, 2024, recommending this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court rules and orders. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff did not file objections or otherwise respond to these Findings and Recommendations. On May 8, 2024, this Court signed an Order adopting the Findings and Recommendations of Judge Cota and dismissed this action for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court rules and orders. (See ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff has now submitted a document entitled “Objection” along with a First Amended Complaint (ECF Nos. 15, 16.) The Court construes the document entitled “Objection” as a Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60. Rule 60 provides that a party…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.