Allison

(PC) Barefield v. Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20252:23-cv-01312California1,497 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 MICHAEL S. BAREFIELD, SR., No. 2:23-cv-01312-DC-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER K. GIBBS, Defendant. 14 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 11. On March 12, 2024, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), the court determined that plaintiff’s first amended complaint (FAC) alleged a potentially cognizable First Amendment claim against defendant K. Gibbs, who is employed as a mailroom supervisor at Mule Creek State Prison. ECF No. 12 at 5. Defendant now moves for a more definite statement under Rule 12(e). ECF No. 18. Plaintiff has not responded.

Plaintiff’s claims against Kathleen Allison and Patrick Covello were dismissed with leave to amend within 30 days. ECF No. 12 at 5. Plaintiff’s claims against Howard Moseley were also dismissed without prejudice. ECF No. 19 at 2. Plaintiff did not file any further amendment of the FAC. 23 Because defendant’s motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.