(PS) White v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20252:23-cv-01857California1,195 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EUGENE WHITE, No. 2:23-cv-01857-DC-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, and this matter is referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Before the Court are Plaintiff’s four motions: 1) motion to dismiss (ECF No. 30); 2) amended motion to dismiss (ECF No. 36); 3) motion to disqualify opposing counsel (ECF No. 38); and 4) motion to withdraw voluntary dismissal (ECF No. 39). The motions were taken under submission on February 5, 2025. ECF No. 44. The Court will grant Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw the earlier-filed motions to dismiss, and deny Plaintiff’s motion to disqualify opposing counsel. I. Background and Procedural History Plaintiff, while represented by counsel, commenced this action in Sacramento County Superior Court in October 2022. Plaintiff proceeds under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and brings claims concerning his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.