(PS)Zhang

(PS)Zhang v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20252:24-cv-01420California301 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 YIRAN ZHANG, Case No. 2:24-cv-1420-DJC-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

SERVICES,

15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On January 14, 2025, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . .…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.