(PC) Azevedo v. Smith

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20252:24-cv-03104California667 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEX LEONARD AZEVEDO, No. 2:24-cv-03104-DC-CKD (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

KEVIN SMITH, PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND DIRECTING

Defendant. PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE FILING FEE

WITHIN 30 DAYS

16 (Doc. No. 7) 17 Plaintiff Alex Leonard Azevedo is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 4, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2) be denied because: (1) he is subject to the three strikes bar under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and (2) the allegations in Plaintiff’s complaint do not satisfy the “imminent danger of serious physical injury” exception to §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.