Litinetsky
Litinetsky v. West Coast Servicing, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 YAKOV LITINETSKY, et al., No. 2:24-cv-03417-DC-SCR Plaintiffs, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
WEST COAST SERVICING INC, et al., (Doc. Nos. 27, 34) Defendants. 15 This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. (Doc. No. 27). Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the court finds it appropriate to take the matter under submission to be decided on the papers. Accordingly, the hearing set on the motion for February 21, 2025 is hereby vacated. For the reasons explained below, the court will deny Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. BACKGROUND On December 9, 2024, Plaintiffs Yakov and Maria Litinetsky filed this action against Defendant West Coast Servicing, Inc. (“WCS”) and Argent Mortgage Company, LLC (“Argent”), alleging various claims arising out of a loan secured by Plaintiffs’ property. (Doc. No. 1.) On December 11, 2024,…