P.

P. v. Corral CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 11, 2013C069934California2,732 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/11/13 P. v. Corral CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Glenn) ----

THE PEOPLE, C069934

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. 10NCR08513, 11NCR08683) v.

DYLAN SCOTT CORRAL,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Dylan Scott Corral appeals his conviction for making criminal threats against his girlfriend, Jessica A. He contends (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion for acquittal; (2) there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction; and (3) the clerk’s probation minute order reflects the incorrect court facility fee. The People concede on all three issues. We find the first two concessions improvidently given and do not accept them. There was sufficient evidence to support the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.