Martinez-Aparicio

Martinez-Aparicio v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 19, 202523-3712California903 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 19 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDGAR BOANERGE MARTINEZ- No. 23-3712 APARICIO; EDGAR ALEXANDER Agency Nos.

MARTINEZ-LEMUS; SONIA A201-748-586

YAMILETH LEMUS-DE A201-748-587

MARTINEZ; ERLY SAMUEL

A201-750-204

MARTINEZ-LEMUS,

A201-750-205

Petitioners,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 11, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ, IKUTA, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Edgar Boanerge Martinez-Aparicio, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). petitions for review of an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.