Jaimemada

Jaimemada v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 19, 202523-937California717 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 19 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN CARLOS JAIMEMADA, No. 23-937 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-312-771 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 14, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and LASNIK, District Judge.***

Juan Carlos Jaime Mada (“Jaime”), a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions

for review of an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA” or “Board”)

dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge (“IJ”) decision denying

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation. cancellation of removal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.