He

He v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 19, 202523-2541California897 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

FEB 19 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MEIYU HE, No. 23-2541

Petitioner, Agency No. A215-610-089

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 14, 2025** Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: S.R. THOMAS, BRESS, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Meiyu He (“He”), a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of her appeal of an Immigration

Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her applications for asylum and withholding of removal.

We deny the petition for review.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. “Where, as here, the BIA

reviewed the IJ’s credibility-based decision for clear error and ‘relied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.