Mansilla-Jimenez

Mansilla-Jimenez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 19, 202524-1365California735 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 19 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YOSELIN CAROLINA MANSILLA- No. 24-1365 JIMENEZ; ASHLIN CELESTE Agency Nos.

VELASQUEZ MANSILLA; LEVI A213-019-811

ANTONIO MANSILLA-JIMENEZ, A213-019-822

A213-019-813

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 14, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: GRABER, TALLMAN, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Yoselin Carolina Mansilla-Jimenez and her minor children are

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). natives and citizens of Guatemala. 1 Petitioners seek review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision to adopt and affirm…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.