Lawrence
Lawrence v. Finicity Corporation
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 19 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KAITLYN LAWRENCE, No. 24-1737 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:23-cv-01005-DJC-AC v.
MEMORANDUM*
FINICITY CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Daniel J. Calabretta, District Court, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 10, 2025 San Francisco, California
Before: OWENS, VANDYKE, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Finicity Corporation (“Finicity”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Mastercard,
appeals from the district court’s denial of its motion to compel arbitration due to
Finicity’s purported failure to provide reasonably conspicuous notice of its terms
and conditions. As the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recount them
here. We have jurisdiction under 9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(1)(B) and review the district
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. court’s decision de novo.…