Bailey

Bailey v. San Francisco District Attorney's Office CA1/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 2025A153520NCalifornia9,320 words

Opinion

Opinion

Banke, J.

Filed 2/18/25 Bailey v. San Francisco District Attorney’s Office CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

TWANDA BAILEY,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A153520

v.

SAN FRANCISCO DISTRICT

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE et al., (San Francisco City & County Super. Ct. No. CGC-15-549675) Defendants and Respondents.

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND

DENYING REHEARING

[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

BY THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on January 22, 2025, be modified as follows: 1. On page 29, the paragraph beginning “Accordingly, there has been no revival of any FEHA,” at the end of the second full sentence of that paragraph, ending “failed to prevent such discrimination,” add as footnote 10, which will require renumbering of all subsequent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.