Hipschman

Hipschman v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20253:22-cv-00903California2,444 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 22CV0903 AJB (BLM) CAROLINA HIPSCHMAN, an individual;

ALEX HIPSCHMAN, an individual, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 13 v. [ECF No. 141] 14 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ January 8, 2025 motion for reconsideration [ECF No. 141 ("Mot.")], Defendant County of San Diego’s (“County”) opposition [ECF No. 144 ("Oppo.")], and Plaintiffs’ reply [ECF No. 146 ("Reply")]. For the reasons set for the below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration. RELEVANT BACKGROUND On November 18, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel the County to provide training materials. See ECF No. 128. The County opposed the motion and on December 11, 2024, the Court issued an Order Denying Plaintiffs’ motion to compel. ECF Nos. 128, 137. On December 26, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a notice of objection and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.