Hipschman
Hipschman v. County of San Diego
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 22CV0903 AJB (BLM) CAROLINA HIPSCHMAN, an individual;
ALEX HIPSCHMAN, an individual, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 13 v. [ECF No. 141] 14 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ January 8, 2025 motion for reconsideration [ECF No. 141 ("Mot.")], Defendant County of San Diego’s (“County”) opposition [ECF No. 144 ("Oppo.")], and Plaintiffs’ reply [ECF No. 146 ("Reply")]. For the reasons set for the below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration. RELEVANT BACKGROUND On November 18, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel the County to provide training materials. See ECF No. 128. The County opposed the motion and on December 11, 2024, the Court issued an Order Denying Plaintiffs’ motion to compel. ECF Nos. 128, 137. On December 26, 2024, Plaintiffs filed a notice of objection and…