Marani

Marani v. Cramer

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20254:19-cv-05538California1,109 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVEN MARANI,

Case No. 19-cv-05538-YGR (DMR) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: v. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 9 MICHAEL CRAMER, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 219 10 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Kevin Marani filed this action in August 2019 against Defendant Michael Cramer1 and ten other Defendants, bringing federal and state law claims related to their participation in an alleged international fraud scheme. At this juncture, two non-defaulting, non- dismissed Defendants remain: Travis Capson and Harvey G. Flemming. Following the court’s direction to enter default against Cramer pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 (Docket No. 216), Marani moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2) for default judgment against Cramer on all claims. The motion was referred to the undersigned for preparation of a report and recommendation. [Docket Nos. 219 (“Mot.”), 223.] The operative Third Amended Complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.