Shirley

(PC) Howard v. Shirley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20251:24-cv-00387California581 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 KARLIS RUBEN AUGUSTUS Case No. 1:24-cv-00387-HBK (PC) HOWARD,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff, RENEWED MOTION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND REASSESSING

v. FULL FILING FEE

HEATHER SHIRLEY, et al., (Doc. No. 43) Defendants. DEFENDANTS TO RETURN

CONSENT/DECLINE OF U.S.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION

FORM

17 10-DAY DEADLINE 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s renewed motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) filed on February 14, 2025. (Doc. No. 43). Plaintiff, a former state prisoner, initiated this action while he was incarcerated. (Doc. No. 1). Although currently released, Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the full amount of the statutory filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). As set forth in the Court’s February 3, 2025 Order, the total amount that remains due towards the $350.00 filing fee is $350.00. (Doc. No. 41 at 3:4-5). Due to Plaintiff’s release from custody, there is no 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.