Khan

Khan v. Madsen

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20255:23-cv-06141California4,011 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MUHAMMAD KHAN,

Case No. 23-cv-06141 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL; v. OF SERVICE 13 HALEY MADSEN, et al., 14 Defendants.

16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner at the outset of this action, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison staff at the Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”), where he previously confined. Dkt. No. 5. The Court screened the “final amended complaint” (“FAC”), Dkt. No. 11, and dismissed it with leave to amend. Dkt. No. 30. When Plaintiff failed to file a second amended complaint in the time provided, the Court dismissed the action and entered judgment. Dkt. Nos. 33, 34. The Court recently found good cause to reopen the matter, after being notified of Plaintiff’s parole status and move out-of-state. Dkt. No. 45. The Court will proceed to screen the “bifurcated” complaint filed by Plaintiff in response to the Court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.