Daniel E. Preciado v. M. Gamboa
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10
DANIEL E. PRECIADO, NO. EDCV 24-1504-KK (AGR)
12 Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS
v. CORPUS SHOULD NOT BE
M. GAMBOA, Warden, DISMISSED
15 Respondent.
Petitioner constructively filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person 19 in State Custody (“Petition”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On the face of the 20 Petition, it appears that the grounds for relief are untimely and unexhausted. The 21 court orders Petitioner to show cause, in writing, on or before March 24, 2025, why the court should not recommend dismissal of the Petition.
26 27 28 I.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
3 The following procedural history is taken from available state court records. 4 See Fed. R. Evid. 201; Porter v. Ollison, 620 F.3d 952, 955 n.1 (9th Cir. 2010) (taking judicial notice of state court docket). 7 The Petition challenges a judgment in the Superior Court of San Bernardino 8 County in Case No.…