Ledwidge
Ledwidge v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 NIALL LEDWIDGE, et al., Case No. 5:24-cv-08352-BLF
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION’S MOTION TO
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE EXTEND DEADLINES UNDER CIVIL CORPORATION, et al., LOCAL RULE 16-5 11 Defendants. [Re: Dkt. No. 27]
13 Defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Company (“FDIC”) moves the Court for an order extending the deadlines set out in Civil Local Rule 16-5 for FDIC to file its answer to the complaint and a certified index of the administrative record. Dkt. No. 27 (“Mot.”). Plaintiffs did not file a response to the motion. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion. I. LEGAL STANDARD Under Civil Local Rule 16-5, “[i]n actions for District Court review on an administrative record . . . the defendant must serve and file an answer, together with a certified copy of the…