(SS) Espinoza v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20251:23-cv-01499California3,656 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAFAEL ESPINOZA, Case No. 1:23-cv-1499-JLT-BAM Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL (Docs. 14, 18)

SECURITY,

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE Defendant. 16 Findings and Recommendations INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Rafael Espinoza (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The matter is currently before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, which was submitted without oral argument, to Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe for findings and recommendations. Having considered the briefing and record in this matter, the Court finds that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) is supported by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.