Brazil

(PC) Bazzo v. Brazil

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20251:24-cv-00768California2,677 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 FRANK MONACO BAZZO, Case No. 1:24-cv-00768-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT

v. JUDGE TO ACTION BRAZIL, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE,

Defendants. FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (ECF No. 1)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

14 Plaintiff Frank Monaco Bazzo (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Based on a preliminary review of the complaint, on January 16, 2025 the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause within twenty-one (21) days why this action should not be dismissed as barred by res judicata or barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the Court’s order would result in dismissal of this action, with prejudice. (Id. at 7.) Plaintiff did not file a response, and the deadline to do so…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.