Jose A. Cardiel v. Nissan North America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20258:25-cv-00274California1,496 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Background

Plaintiffs sued Defendants in Orange County Superior Court for alleged violations of California’s Song-Beverly Act connected to their purchase of a 2023 Nissan Rogue (the “Vehicle”). See generally Notice of Removal (“Notice”)(Dkt. 1), Exhibit A- Complaint (“Compl.”) (Dkt. 1-Exhibit A).

Plaintiffs originally filed suit in the Superior Court of California, County of Orange, on November 6, 2024. Compl. at 1. On February 11, 2025, Defendants Nissan North America, Inc. removed the action to this Court, asserting diversity jurisdiction. See generally Notice.

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 8:25-cv-00274-DOC-DFM Date: February 18, 2025 Page

II. Legal Standard

“If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Removal of a case from state court to federal court is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1441, which provides in relevant part that “any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed . . . to the district court of the United States for the district and division…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.