Daram

(PC) Bowcutt v. Daram

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20252:21-cv-00736California7,505 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONALD RAY BOWCUT, No. 2:21-cv-00736 SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

VASUKI DARAM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Presently before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 47.) For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends that defendants’ motion be granted. The undersigned further orders the Clerk of the Court to correct the docket to reflect the proper spelling of plaintiff’s last name, “Bowcutt.” (See ECF No. 38.) PROCEDURAL HISTORY This case is proceeding on plaintiff’s complaint filed April 23, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) On screening, the previously assigned magistrate judge found plaintiff stated a cognizable claim of deliberate indifference to a serious medical need under the Eighth Amendment against defendants Daram, Vaughn, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.