(PC) Mayes v. San Joaquin County Courts

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20252:24-cv-00459California245 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEDVIENO D’BARGE MAYES, No. 2:24-cv-0459 TLN CKD P Plaintiff, v. SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY COURTS, et FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS al., 15 Defendants.

17 On September 9, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. The amended complaint was due on February 3, 2025, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified ///// ///// 1 || time waives the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.