United States v. David Arevalo

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 12, 201312-50330California253 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 12 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-50330

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00204-DDP

v.

MEMORANDUM *

DAVID JOHN AREVALO, a.k.a. FNU

LNU,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dean D. Pregerson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 18, 2013 **

Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

David John Arevalo appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and six-month sentence for making a false

statement in a passport application and use thereof, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1542. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Arevalo’s counsel

has filed a brief stating…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.