Longina Perez Monroy v. Ruben Perez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 202523-55793California925 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LONGINA PEREZ MONROY; DAVID No. 23-55793 MONROY, individually and as successors in interest to the deceased, Jeffrey Alexander D.C. No. Monroy, 5:21-cv-01278-MEMF-KK

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

RUBEN PEREZ, Corporal, in his individual capacity,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a municipal entity; CHAD BIANCO, Sheriff, in his individual capacity and official capacities,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 18, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: RAWLINSON, CHRISTEN, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Longina Perez Monroy and David Monroy, (“Plaintiffs”) individually and as

successors in interest to Jeffrey Alexander Monroy (“Monroy”) brought this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.