Bondi

Tapia Ortiz v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 202523-568California412 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RENE TAPIA ORTIZ, No. 23-568 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-718-446 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 14, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and LASNIK, District Judge.***

Petitioner Rene Tapia Ortiz petitions for review of a Board of Immigration

Appeals (BIA) decision denying his “Motion to Reconsider and Reopen Removal

Proceedings Sua Sponte and Stay of Removal.” The BIA’s refusal to exercise its sua

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation. sponte authority…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.