Bennett

Bennett v. Lynch

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 202523-2223California715 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JABRIE BENNETT, No. 23-2223

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-05675-WHO

v.

MEMORANDUM*

Warden JEFF LYNCH,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William H. Orrick, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 12, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: VANDYKE and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.**

Petitioner Jabrie Bennett seeks review of a district court judgment denying a

writ of habeas corpus. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(a), and we

affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Dana L. Christensen, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), we apply

a “highly deferential” standard when evaluating state court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.