Jay

United States v. Jay

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 20, 202524-3875California299 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 20 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-3875 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:20-cr-00195-DCN-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

DONALD JOE JAY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho David C. Nye, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 18, 2025**

Before: SILVERMAN, WARDLAW, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Donald Joe Jay appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the

14-month sentence imposed upon the revocation of his supervised release. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Jay contends that the district court erred by failing to award him credit under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b) for time served on “related incarceration” at the Fort…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.