Aaron Hunter v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20252:17-cv-06006California786 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. 2:17-cv-06006-JDE Date February 20, 2025

Title Aaron Hunter v. Leland Dudeck, Acting Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

Present: The Honorable John D. Early, United States Magistrate Judge

Amber Rodriguez n/a

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendant:

n/a n/a

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order re Briefing on Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Dkt. 25) On February 4, 2025, counsel for Plaintiff filed a Motion for Attorney’s Fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (Dkt. 25, “Motion”) and attests that the Motion was served by mail upon Plaintiff with and advisement regarding Plaintiff’s right to object to the Motion. Motion at 2, 17. On February 5, 2025, the case was reassigned to the current magistrate judge, who issued a briefing order on the Motion, directing that the Motion would be decided on the papers without a hearing, with any opposition or other position to be filed by February 18, 2025, at which time the matter would be deemed submitted. Dkt. 26, 27 (“Briefing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.