Roditi

Roditi v. New River Investments Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20253:20-cv-01908California1,214 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MANUEL RODITI and VENICE Case No.: 3:20-cv-01908-RBM-MSB

BEJARANO,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

Plaintiffs, EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR v. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

ORDER PENDING OUTCOME OF

NEW RIVER INVESTMENTS INC., et MOTION FOR CHARGING ORDER al., 16 Defendants. [Doc. 255] 17 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Manuel Roditi and Venice Bejarano’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order Pending Outcome of Motion for Charging Order, which was filed on February 5, 2025 (“Ex Parte Application”). (Doc. 255.) Defendants New River Investments Inc., Alberto Roditi, and Guillermo Roditi Dominguez (collectively, “Defendants”) have not opposed the Ex Parte Application. In their Ex Parte Application, Plaintiffs indicate that they will file a Motion for a charging order against Roditi & Roditi, LLC, which has two members—Defendants Alberto Roditi and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.