Mahoney

Mahoney v. Facebook, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20253:22-cv-02873California3,984 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GENEVIEVE MAHONEY, Case No. 22-cv-02873-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

META PLATFORMS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 134 Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc.’s (“Meta”) motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for July 11, 2024, was vacated. See Civ. L.R. 7-6. This order assumes familiarity with the facts and procedural history of the case, which were thoroughly discussed in the Court’s Order Granting Motion to Dismiss (ECF 129). Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS Meta’s motion, for the following reasons. I. DISCUSSION Meta pursues essentially two motions in a single filing: (1) a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.