Gibson

Gibson v. Fleming CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 12, 2013F065577California4,207 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/12/13 Gibson v. Fleming CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

NEIL B. GIBSON,

F065577

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. S-1500-CV-276270) v.

NICK V. FLEMING, JR., OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. William D. Palmer, Judge. Law Offices of David J. Harter, David J. Harter, for Defendant and Appellant. Swanson O‟Dell, Jeremy D. Swanson and Seth N. O‟Dell, for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo- Plaintiff Neil B. Gibson sued defendant Nick V. Fleming, Jr., for defamation and related causes of action after Fleming posted statements on the Internet asserting that Gibson was involved in financial services fraud, among other things. Fleming filed an anti-SLAPP…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.