Pfieffer

(PC) Stone v. Pfieffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20251:21-cv-01461California2,492 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM JAY STONE, No. 1:21-cv-01461-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR ATTENDANCE OF INCARCERATED

v. WITNESSES C. PFEIFFER, et al., (ECF No. 190) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Adam Jay Stone is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is proceeding against Defendants B. Gonzales, G. Morales, K. Gonzales, and Anderson for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment, and the case is currently set for jury trial on April 29, 2025. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses, filed January 8, 2025. (ECF No. 190.) After receiving an extension of time, Defendants filed an opposition on February 4, 2025, and Plaintiff filed a reply on February 18, 2025. (ECF Nos. 195, 196, 206, 211.) Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for attendance of incarcerated witnesses is deemed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.