Jameson

Jameson v. Ringside Development Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20253:24-cv-08654California1,963 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 KEVIN JAMESON Case No. 3:24-CV-08654-CRB

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

STAY

RINGSIDE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY dba Bio One Colorado, Inc., et al.,

Defendants.

This action arises from a dispute between franchisee Kevin Jameson and franchisor Ringside Development Company. Jameson alleges several causes of action based on Ringside’s allegedly fraudulent representations about its products. Ringside now moves to stay the action pending resolution of the dispute through contractually mandated alternative dispute resolution. The Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), vacates the hearing, and GRANTS Ringside’s motion to stay. I. BACKGROUND Ringside, doing business as Bio One Colorado, Inc., is a franchisor in the biohazard remediation industry. Compl. (dkt. 1-3) at 3. Franchisees obtain the right to use Bio One’s …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.