Clendenin

(PC) Hoch v. Clendenin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20251:23-cv-00796California8,139 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CORY HOCH, 1:23-cv-00796-KES-SKO Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

STEPHANIE CLENDENIN, et al., (Doc. 27)

Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE

17 18 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Clendenin and Price for violations of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights. I. BACKGROUND On September 26, 2024, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 27.) The motion included a notice and warning regarding the requirements for opposing the motion. (Id. at 2-4.) On October 16, 2024, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion seeking an extension of time within which to respond to Defendants’ motion. (Doc. 29.) Plaintiff was directed to file his 28 opposition “no later than November 18, 2024.” (Id.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.