Stohl

Denies Order 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID ARTHUR DEPONTE, Case No. 1:24-cv-00695-KES-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. (Doc. No. 55) STOHL, STERN, J. SAUCEDO, K.

SUDANO, M. DOBE, GUNSAGA,

15 Defendants. 16 On January 8, 2025, Plaintiff filed a “Motion for Summary Judgment.” (Doc. No. 55, “MSJ”). The MSJ comprises three pages. Plaintiff claims that he is entitled to summary judgment against all defendants on the claims raised in his complaint. (See generally, Id.). On August 28, 2024, the undersigned issued Findings and Recommendations to permit Plaintiff to proceed on his Second Amended Complaint on the claims deemed cognizable and dismiss the remaining claims and defendants. (Doc. No. 45, “F&R”). Plaintiff filed objections to the F&R. (Doc. No. 47). As of the date of this Order, the district court has not ruled on the F&R. (See docket). Thus, Defendants have not yet been served in this action. (See Id.). Until the district…