Jane Doe v. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20258:23-cv-01554California7,023 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION JANE DOE (A.M.L.), Case No. 8:23-cv-01554-JVS- JDE Plaintiff, 13 vs. CONFIDENTIALITY PROTECTIVE ORDER

WYNDHAM HOTELS AND RESORTS;

PATSIKO, INC.; SUNSTONE ANAHEIM

OWNER, LLC; DAYS INN

16 WORLDWIDE, INC.; and WYNDHAM HOTEL GROUP, LLC, 18 Defendants. 19 20 For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. 81) in part and finds and orders as follows. 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve the production of confidential, proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than pursuing this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the Court to enters the following Protective Order. This Order does not protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.