Xiong

Xiong v. Garland

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20251:24-cv-00802California1,427 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAICHUN XIONG, Case No. 1:24-cv-00802-CDB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE

TO PROSECUTE AND TO OBEY COURT

MERRICK B. GARLAND, et al., ORDERS AND LOCAL RULES

Defendants. (Doc. 16)

14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge 18 Relevant Background On July 10, 2024, Plaintiff Kaichun Xiong (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this action with the filing of a complaint for writ of mandamus against Defendants Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, and Ur. M. Jaddou (“Defendants”). (Docs. 1, 3). On December 19, 2024, Defendants filed the pending motion to dismiss and served the motion upon Plaintiff. (Doc. 13). On January 14, 2025, Defendants replied in support of the pending motion, noting that Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.