Xiong
Xiong v. Garland
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20251:24-cv-00802California1,427 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAICHUN XIONG, Case No. 1:24-cv-00802-CDB
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT
v. PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE
TO PROSECUTE AND TO OBEY COURT
MERRICK B. GARLAND, et al., ORDERS AND LOCAL RULES
Defendants. (Doc. 16)
14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD
Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge 18 Relevant Background On July 10, 2024, Plaintiff Kaichun Xiong (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this action with the filing of a complaint for writ of mandamus against Defendants Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, and Ur. M. Jaddou (“Defendants”). (Docs. 1, 3). On December 19, 2024, Defendants filed the pending motion to dismiss and served the motion upon Plaintiff. (Doc. 13). On January 14, 2025, Defendants replied in support of the pending motion, noting that Plaintiff…